Napoleon: The Warrior Unmasked
Drew A Larson
Western Oregon University , 2014
"Unfortunately, and to many historians’ annoyance, there are two beliefs on the subject of Napoleon. The first belief is that Napoleon lived as a superb soldier and possessed a great mind. Napoleon, the savior of the French, had pulled the France out of their downward spiral, and regained their prior fame. The other, opposing, belief holds that Napoleon was a monstrous war hungry dictator; instead of a savior, Napoleon is viewed as a tyrant who sought world domination at all costs. These beliefs were held both during and after Napoleon’s lifetime. Each side has constructed concrete argument, yet the modern, typical, view of Napoleon seems to be the latter of the two.... "
https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=his
'Enthusiasts'- good word
@david Tomlinson "Either way, I don’t think 1812 will have affected US mainstream psyche overly much? Or am I misreading US popular culture?" Presumably some Americans have an inkling of the origin of their national anthem.
That may be true, based on the Forum, but in reality most Americans barely know there own history. Generally all Americans know about Napoleon is that his was a funny short guy who was in "Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure." But, I'll admit, the "Black Legend" isn't as powerful in the US as the UK.
I would agree there's a diversion between the public in general and scholarly opinion. (I also doubt N.'s "revered" in France currently, though my feeling is that opinion's more nuanced in France than elsewhere.)
Thanks for sharing this Tom - very interesting. Not sure that I agree with the suggestion made by Drew that Napoleon is almost always seen as a military leader. That may be true of the public, but certainly isn't the case amongst most scholars in my opinion - you can't really understand the man without looking at the political as well as the military.